| Appraisal History The doomsday survey of 1066 A.D. of all the properties and possessions in England, Scotland and Wales seems to be the first truly comprehensive effort to create a basis for evaluating property for the purpose of levying taxes. In 1523 in England, a text entitled "Book of Husbandry and Book of Surveying" was published by a Mr. Fitzherbert. Surveying during this period was a term used to describe both the measurement of land itself and the measurement of its value, most commonly rental value since most property either belonged to the crown or to the church at the time. One early pioneer in the U. S. was a Mr. Smellie, a Scotsman, who with a name like that, naturally gravitated into the law, becoming an attorney and later a politician, and capitalizing on his expertise as a railway valuer and arbitrator. He was the originator of a standardized market data comparison process in 1860. A written appraisal dated 1915 consisted of a 6"x 8" index card, hand-written with an address, date of "viewing", the simplest of descriptions, special features (one line) and an estimated value "for sale". George Hoyt, a very early member of the American Society of Appraisers, started his career in 1909 as a "pricer" of real estate, traveling by horse and buggy through the hills and flatlands of Oakland and Berkeley (California). An appraisal dated 1922 is one-page long, identifying the property as a two-story, 30-year old retail building, in good condition, and in a good location, occupied by two tenured retail businesses and two office tenants on the second floor, generating $3,000 per year in rent. The letter concludes that "a desirable price for your property is $25,000." In England, such short reports are still the norm. Form reports are a Post WWII phenomena created primarily by the federal government's FHA and VA. In 1958, these forms were one page in length, very simple, little discussion, and mostly boxes to check off. Savings and loans also developed their own forms during this period, usually even simpler and shorter in form and content. There was no real standardization until well into the 1970s. The computer age has changed all this with standardization increasing nationwide. Appraisers' roots are in the 16th century, modeled on 18th century valuers and surveyors in the British Empire. |
| LOOK! GOOD NEWS! AFFORDABILITY INDEX HITS FOUR YEAR HIGH Lower loan rates and lower median home prices combined to produce some of the highest affordability rates since May of 2004. The just released figures for September 2008 indicate that at 30%, nearly one third of households in the Fortuna market qualify for a median price home. The McKinleyville market hasn’t seen it’s index this high since March of 2005 when the median home price was $298,000. The figures compiled and released by the Humboldt Association of Realtors show the current median sold home price at $291,000. "We are at levels that are equal to the normal market before the boom of 2006 when only one in ten households could qualify to buy in Humboldt County” Reports Tom Hiller, HAR President. “Now, finally, there are homes on the market at rock bottom prices. Good deals are out there for investors and opportunities abound for first time buyers.” Hiller said. Using multiple listing service data, HAR has been tracking affordability data for the last ten years. Additional information on county-wide affordability indexes is available upon request from the Assn. The HAR® provides services that enhance the knowledge and resources for real estate professionals and communities they serve. Lois Lee Busey, Executive Officer Humboldt Association of Realtors |
| National News from Associated Press... Housing expected to get worse before it gets much better... A new report by the Joint Economic Committee estimates there will be 1.3 million foreclosures from mid-2007 thru 2009 in subprime mortgages, loans provided to borrowers with weak credit histories. Those foreclosures will wipe out an estimated $71 billion in housing wealth directly and another $32 billion indirectly by lowering the values of neighboring homes costing states $917 million in lost property tax revenue thru 2009. California, New York, New Jersay and Florida are expected to be the biggest losers. |